I agree to this if the payment can be made in USDx

[@wdC2...9p9q](wdC2vDs8zRd6NRsJPaUaKKwbx9ZyYA5wRa7k8Ek1sCnye9p9q-interlay) 
The treasury does not hold any stable coins yet and to get some, treasury would have to sell INTR so I don't see the point of reason to not support this proposal but one where treasury pays in stable coins.

[@wdBy...aFCn](wdByuu2kQ8f4DSn12yZiV5AKurXzTc5yfJyut7nSvpdijaFCn-interlay)
 There is only speculation on your part, doing all those tricks to simply sell the same tokens, it makes no sense. They are offering a service to the users, we pay them, they decide what to do with the tokens is like that

The $6000 would simply mean 1% price impact on HydraDX, and even so can use the split feature to get a lower price impact https://app.hydradx.io/trade/swap?assetIn=17&assetOut=10

It is not a time bomb like you say, and they are necessary expenses that the project must pay, that is why the Treasury is there to pay for related things.

web3 foundation does not pay anything to the parachains, the grants were initially a few years ago and had nothing to now? 

So I don't understand that other point?



[@wdCt...vGj8](wdCth6mYwN2JqwdNSF1Kci368PLjvC8ZRpTgiNRPZrT3cvGj8-interlay) 

I made a proposal that included the applicant's interests, but I am disappointed that my intentions were not properly conveyed.

There is only speculation on your part, doing all those tricks to simply sell the same tokens, it makes no sense. They are offering a service to the users, we pay them, they decide what to do with the tokens is like that

The $6000 would simply mean 1% price impact on HydraDX, and even so can use the split feature to get a lower price impact https://app.hydradx.io/trade/swap?assetIn=17&assetOut=10

It is not a time bomb like you say, and they are necessary expenses that the project must pay, that is why the Treasury is there to pay for related things.

web3 foundation does not pay anything to the parachains, the grants were initially a few years ago and had nothing to now?

So I don't understand that other point?


Please remember that is a service 600$ at month is not a big thing, is not expensive for something that we will use each day

We submit this proposal due to the failure of [Referendum #86](https://interlay.subsquare.io/democracy/referenda/86). The proposed value is recalculated by the latest EMA7 price on subscan. You can check [referendum #86](https://interlay.subsquare.io/democracy/referenda/86) and [subsquare changelog](https://github.com/opensquare-network/subsquare/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) for deliveries.

Some statements from OpenSquare:
- We don't make profit from deployments of interlay and kintsugi. Developers have to be paid for delivered work.
- This proposal is for the retroactive work.
- OpenSquare accept fiat tokens if the community want to pay in USDx, but before the decision and final actions, please don't just reject this proposal.
- We are maintaining a separate [code base](https://github.com/opensquare-network/subsquare/tree/main/packages/kintsugi-next) for interlay/kintsugi, because the democracy pallet is different from that on other chains. It cost additional work from my team.
- We have reduced the price for interlay by 25%(from $800 to $600 per month).


| Item        | detail            | Cost   |
|-------------|-------------------|--------|
| Interlay maintenance | 2023.03 - 2023.12 | $6,000 |
| Total      | $0.027/INTR by EMA7 price on subscan | 222,222 INTR |

- OpenSquare is proposing a new value after a failed referendum.
- They want to be paid for their work on interlay and kintsugi.
- They accept fiat tokens as payment.
- They have a separate code base for interlay/kintsugi, which costs extra work.
- They reduced the price for interlay by 25%.

Item	detail	Cost
Interlay maintenance	2023.03 - 2023.12	$6,000
Total	$0.027/INTR by EMA7 price on subscan	222,222 INTR

Resubmission of subsquare maintenance from 03.2023 to 12.2023