Proposal #124
Referendum #116

Increase iBTC target APR 5%->10%. Increase Interlay fee 10%->15%

Democracy
3mos ago
15 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Votes
AyePassing thresholdNay
73%27%
Aye
8.8MvINTR
Nay
3.29MvINTR
Turnout
12.09MvINTR
Electorate
0vINTR
Passed
How Interlay Governance Works.
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
Comments

For me is nay to the first part

  1. Increase Interlay protocol revenue from the now heavily used iBTC money market

And aye to second part.
2. Decrease the slope of the iBTC money market curve under high utilization to reduce the APY impact from deposits and withdrawals of collateral (or repayment of loans)

If the proposal have both points I will have to nay it all.

The reason is, we can't penalise borrows and push the premium for iBTC on Hydradation even more, if there isn't any alternative to aquire iBTC.

Edited

Reply
Up

Aye: Increase iBTC (borrower) target APR 5%->10%
Nay: Increase Interlay (treasury) fee 10%->15%

I would support the proposal if the increased treasury fee is removed.

Edited

Reply
Up

I calculate that Interlay's money markets currently earn about $16k/year. 0.1% fee on iBTC mint/redeem could possibly earn $13k. That's still only $30k which is certainly not enough to maintain the protocol, much less add features.

Although I will strive to increase the number of markets on Interlay, and find ways to increase USDT/USDC/DOT money market depth, increasing revenue from a few key markets is one of our best levers to increase Interlay protocol revenue and therefore increase INTR value. We're looking for Interlay money markets where increasing the revenue % will not have much impact on lender's motivations to deposit tokens into the money markets. This is one of those.

Reply
Up