Proposal #121
Referendum #115

2024-Q2-Interlay Network-Funding Proposal for Operation and Maintenance Fee

Democracy
3mos ago
5 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up 1
Share
Votes
AyePassing thresholdNay
95%5%
Aye
7.27MvINTR
Nay
361.73KvINTR
Turnout
7.63MvINTR
Electorate
0vINTR
Passed
How Interlay Governance Works.
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
Comments

Subscan is great, but the eco and specially (still) small projects can't afford paying over and over again. There should be a solution for the whole eco. Is there a report how much funds subscan got in the past or does get from Polkadot and all parachains?
Was subscan built with private funds? How does other blockchain explorers in other ecos survive?

Reply
Up 1

@wd8h...k6WD Yes Subscan was built privately. I'm not aware of any revenue stream other than parachain treasuries paying to use their service. Note that Blockscout (on Moonriver/Moonbeam) closed down leaving only Moonscan for EVM. Polkascan now closed down. There aren't really any alternatives. Personally I think $2.5k per quarter ($800/mo) is ok. Note that having a block explorer in general is critical for user funds transparency. I recently pointed out to Polimec that the rudimentary block explorer they're using is insufficient and one reason PLMC shouldn't be listed in the Omnipool.
--spazcoin

Edited

Reply
Up