Proposal #105
Referendum #101

Subscan-Funding Proposal for Interlay Network Operation and Maintenance Fee

Democracy
6 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Votes
AyePassing thresholdNay
77%23%
Aye
10.85MvINTR
Nay
3.24MvINTR
Turnout
14.09MvINTR
Electorate
0vINTR
Passed
How Interlay Governance Works.
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
Comments

Who are you? The account has no ID.

Reply
Up

Hi, I am a team member of Subscan, with the beneficiary address being the official Subscan address (identity set on-chain). Thank you for your confirmation. :)

Reply
Up

Is there a past proposal from Subscan we compare this new one to?

Reply
Up

The expenses were previously covered directly by the team in USD. Starting from the most recent cycle, they have applied to utilize the treasury for payment, hence this proposal is the first one. We have also sent the link to the team, maybe they can help to confirm. Thanks!

Reply
Up

hey sir, it seems to me that the circ/locked token distribution It is wrong, and therefore it is difficult to manage, many of the accounts there already have free tokens, but it appears that only a small part is free?

For example only treasury is 220m of tokens , but is not counted like on circ? Since on ci4c only appear 166m of token

Edited

Reply
Up

Voted nay. I would like to have such proposals in a better stage of the market or when we have USDT available to pay for them.

Edited

Reply
Up 1