Support increasing min. vault size, but 2% slash seems too low and not sensitive especially for small vaults.

Plan seems better to me:
- 10% slashing
- increase min. collateral value (the different min. values for DOT and USDT is still a question)
- increase liquidation thereshold to ensure liquidators will have at least 10%+ vig after slashing penalty and compete hard to liquidate for this vig

The explanation I got is that the issue with 10% slashing is that it can push vaults below 1:1 peg and break the bridge. Therefore I support the ref.


**Based on the (discussion post)**[https://interlay.subsquare.io/posts/37] **this proposal will:**

- Changing slashing for vaults from unprocessed redeems from 10% to 2%

- Increasing the minimum collateral for all vaults to `$1,000 * secure_threshold` to ensure premium redeems and liquidations remain profitable

The under-collateralized iBTC in the liquidation vault has already been burned in the meantime. There is still a ~$50 position in the liquidation vault, however, there is an ongoing redeem on this position, so that the liquidated iBTC cannot be burned at the moment.



Improving Vault and Bridge Security